Mac os x mavericks pros and cons
Is Voiceover perfect? No, of course not. When something strange does happen, it is usually a setting I changed and not Voiceover misbehaving. Yes, some apps have trouble with VoiceOver, most notably Xcode, but in general I find VoiceOver to be more stable and predictable than anything on Windows. It helps that OSX runs more smoothly than Windows, and that when a program locks up, the entire computer is not affected. If, for example, Firefox freezes on Windows, I cannot do anything with the machine until it eventually un-freezes or lets me open Task Manager, Through all that, of course, NVDA is silent.
When an app freezes on the Mac, VoiceOver tells me the app is "busy", but I can use the rest of the Mac with no problems at all. It is very, very rare for my entire computer to lock up on me--in fact, I cannot remember the last time it happened. On the contrary, the two work together well. However, when VoiceOver is running, newer versions of Xcode can sometimes slow down. Such decreases in performance are not seen when Voiceover is disabled. Apple's implementation of braille support isn't perfect, but it is good.
The best feature is the automatic support for over forty displays right out of the box. I can also easily customize the braille key assignments, getting rid of ones I never use and replacing them with commands I need. There is no need to find and fight with special drivers, restart your screen reader, find the proper com port, virtualize any ports, or anything else I've had to try in Windows over the years.
Instead, the process is easy, fast, and, in my experience, reliable. It seems that, with each major OSX update, new or improved voices are offered; Mavericks brought us the latest "expressive" voices, including Oliver, Ava, and others.source link
Is Your Mac Still Running OS X Lion? Why? You Should Upgrade to OS X Mavericks
They sound great, and they are system-wide. That means that any app that can use text to speech can use them. By contrast, Jaws comes with similar voices, but they are tied to your Jaws installation. They cannot be used by other apps, not even other screen readers. Yes, the Mac lacks the familiar voices like Eloquence or Espeak, but it does have low-quality and therefore faster voices available, such as Fred or Ralph.
Windows comes with a basic wordprocessor Notepad , a web browser, a media player, and that's pretty much it. If you want a calendar, or advanced wordprocessor, or mail client, or plenty of other apps, you have to download them. Note: Windows 8 may be different, but I am speaking about Windows 7 as I have no experience with anything newer. When you boot up your Mac and, it is worth repeating, configure everything with no sighted help, you will have a bunch of apps ready to go. Mail, Calendar, Reminders, Text Edit which does far more than Notepad , and more, all ready and waiting.
No need to find and install Windows Live anything, or purchase an over-priced Microsoft Office package. Note: these apps are free so long as you purchased your Mac new, after September of All three are fully accessible, and with Voiceover already built in, you would be hard pressed to find a platform on which it is easier to get up and running with similar software.
Additionally, the built-in apps are, generally, easier to use than their Windows counterparts. Internet Explorer, for instance, has popups that some screen readers never announce and that cannot be moved to with a hotkey. Outlook is, the last time I looked, usable, but inconsistent and not very efficient for screen reader users.
Overall, I find the apps that the Mac comes with to be far more screen reader friendly than those that come with Windows, not to mention more stable. Using Safari is very different from using Firefox or Internet Explorer, but it has its upsides. First, you can jump by heading, link, table, and a few other elements without switching modes at all, while still being able to type text in edit fields or issue keyboard commands to the webpage. Second, Quick Nav the mode that lets you move around with only the arrow keys and use first-letter web element navigation is customizable--you can change which keys move by which elements.
You can also assign trackpad gestures, such as control-flick down to move by heading. Doing so eliminates the need to mess with Quick Nav or the rotor. Safari also includes a function called Reader. This is a way to strip extra stuff from a page, leaving only the "meat" of it for you to read. It works best on articles or blogs, and is a great way to avoid having to figure out a page's structure so you can move to the content you want to read. While not strictly an accessibility feature, Reader has huge benefits for VoiceOver users, so I thought I would include it here. Apple lets VoiceOver, Zoom, and other accessibility service users call or email them directly.
They will answer questions, accept bug reports, and offer workarounds or suggestions for bugs they are working on fixing. This level of contact and support is wonderful, especially for new users who may not be sure where to start. Plus, while reporting a bug does not mean it will be fixed immediately, it is comforting to have the confirmation that your report was seen and passed along. Microsoft offers an accessibility department as well, but when I called them to ask some simple questions about Windows Phone screen readers, my experience was not at all pleasant or informative. By contrast, I have yet to have a bad experience while talking to anyone at Apple.
Using a Mac is not all roses, and the Mac is not right for everyone. To keep things balanced and provide an accurate picture of this platform, I will now tell you all the things that drive me nuts about the Mac. VoiceOver is, as I said, very tightly integrated into the Mac's operating system. While this lets it speak during system updates, recovery mode, and other places Windows screen readers cannot, it has one major drawback.
Since it is not its own app, it cannot be updated like other apps. Instead, you must wait until Apple releases another OSX update, which can often take a while and may not fix the bug at all. VoiceOver has bugs, like any application on any computer anywhere. However, it can take far longer to get them fixed than in other screen readers, and that can be very frustrating depending on the bug in question. For example, the initial release of OS As you may know, that was in October of It was only in OS It took over a year for the commands that move between Web Spots in Safari to get flipped around--for a long time, the "next web spot" command moved you backward, and vice versa.
Nuance voices on the Mac still say the word "capital" before a capital letter, no matter what VoiceOver is set to do when it encounters uppercase letters. I could go on, but you get the point; bugs, from small to not-so-small, can and do persist for a long time. Some, the critical ones, are fixed right away--I don't mean to imply that VoiceOver is a mess of bugs and broken features--but some hang around no matter what you do.
Are these problems show-stoppers? Not at all. Still, coming from a screen reader like NVDA, where the developers respond to user input personally and where several major releases come out every year, it can be a shock to encounter this seeming lack of support from Apple. It is also frustrating to put up with bugs that seem like they would be trivial to fix. Of course, in a huge company like Apple, where VoiceOver is one in a long list of apps and services to keep running, we can only guess at how things are prioritized.
Apple does let users contact their Accessibility Team directly, but alerting them to a bug does not guarantee a fix, only that it is now on the list. People should also remember that accessibility is more than VoiceOver; there is Zoom, subtitles, switch control, and other features for a range of disabilities. When VoiceOver becomes one in a list of services, it is easier to see why bugs might hang on so long, though this does not help users be less frustrated.
In Windows screen readers, applications that are not accessible can sometimes be made more so through scripts. Interface elements can be re-classified, key-presses simulated, and more. VoiceOver can be controlled through Applescript, but not to the same degree.
Of course, I find far less situations on the Mac where such a capability would be useful in fact, to date I have yet to need this feature , but the fact remains that VoiceOver is not as scriptable as Windows screen readers. Yes, it's a pro and a con, in my view. Web browsing is a huge part of most computer activities today, so every operating system needs a solid web browser.
Safari is Apple's answer, and it performs very, very well. For VoiceOver users, however, the switch to Safari can be a shock, and there are aspects that may always annoy some people, no matter how long they use the mac. In Windows, you can use the arrow keys on webpages just as you can in regular documents.
That is, you can read line by line, word by word, and so forth, while having access to keys to jump around a page based on different elements. The Mac includes similar hotkeys, two sets of them in fact, and offers the same arrow key navigation. The problem is that VoiceOver still treats each "chunk" as a separate entity. This can be seen if you review part of a paragraph with the arrow keys, then decide you want to start reading from there. You issue the "say all" command, and VoiceOver starts reading… at the beginning of the paragraph. Focus was on the whole chunk of text, so VoiceOver reads from that chunk, not from exactly where you were inside it.
Safari has other oddities that may not be apparent until you've used it for a while. It has its advantages, such as no "forms mode" to worry about and automatic auto-fill and bookmark backup to iCloud, but navigating the web using Safari and Voiceover is very, very different from Windows. It took me years to get to the point where I can honestly say that I no longer miss Firefox on Windows, and even now, the slight lag present in much of VoiceOver is something that makes itself apparent if you browse the same page on a Mac on Windows, side by side.
That's not to say Safari is at all unusable or slower, it just takes a lot to use Safari's strengths and work around what it can't do as efficiently. The Mac has a great deal to offer. Aside from the mainstream features deep iCloud integration, outstanding build quality, service, good out-of-the-box apps, and much more it is amazingly accessible. Want to try out a mac? You can walk up to any Mac in your local computer store, hit command-f5, and go for it.
Try that on Windows, and, well, it's not going to happen. VoiceOver is more than a basic screen reader, though; it has a rich set of settings, full braille support, a plethora of voices, such good OS integration that you can turn it on during a system update, scripting abilities, and more. In my experience, VoiceOver, and the Mac in general, run more smoothly and reliably than Windows, and the hardware is great.
The Mac can be used for everything from productivity to entertainment, and once you know VoiceOver's commands, you can do it all. Even if you have never used a particular app before, if you know the basics of VoiceOver, you can figure it out provided, of course, that said app is accessible. No fiddling with multiple cursor modes or virtualizing the screen, you just use the same commands you're used to. On the down side, the Mac is a more expensive machine at the outset to those saying they would buy a screen reader anyway, I point you to NVDA.
VoiceOver is part of the operating system, which means that any problems have to wait for OS updates to get fixed. Yes, you can email or call the Apple Accessibility team directly, but such communication does not guarantee that your feedback will make it into the next, or any, update. Apple has made extraordinary progress in the accessibility field, and they continue to do so, but sometimes the "little things" seem to get overlooked, or features that seem obvious never arrive. VoiceOver is mature enough that I don't feel I need all those updates to be productive and happy with my Mac.
Are there bugs I wish could be eradicated, and features I wish would be added?
- action replay ds software mac.
- macOS Mojave Public Beta — The Good!
- how to make video call from mac to iphone;
- macOS Mojave Public Beta Is Here, but Should You Download It?.
Does not having these fixes and features inhibit my ability to efficiently use my Mac? No, not for me at least. Do the benefits of the Mac platform and Apple ecosystem outweigh the advantages I would get from a Windows screenreader? Is this entirely subjective? Of course, and that's why I wrote this article. I wanted to give an honest assessment of where I feel the Mac excels, and where potential users need to know it lacks. If you found this useful, if you hated it, if I missed something, if you think I'm an idiot for choosing Mac… Leave a comment.
Why do you still prefer Windows? Why did you switch to the Mac? What issues are keeping you from choosing one over the other? What questions do you have about the mac's accessibility? Can you explain where the bias comes in? I used Windows for many years, and Mac for just over two, so have a working knowledge of both. I did my best to be accurate in regards to each platform's strengths and weaknesses, but if you see inaccuracies, please tell me so I can fix them. First off, I want to say that as a lifelong Windows user, since I made the switch to Mac a few months ago, I've had almost no reason to regret the change.
I have VM Ware and honestly only use it for an audio game I'm helping develop that is currently only on Windows. I especially want to second the comments about Mac-native apps being easier to use than their Windows counterparts. I find myself sorely missing my Mac when checking email on my Windows computer at work, and have already found several applications where Pages is far more streamlined than the latest version of Word.
All of that said, I want to mention another plus that may have been overlooked: the interaction with the rest of your Apple ecosystem. I imagine far more people on this site have iPhones than Macs, and I've been thrilled with the way my Mac and my iPhone interact. Probably my favorite thing is the Messages app - when I'm at home, I almost never text with my phone because it's just that much quicker and more efficient to use Messages on my Mac.
I also appreciate that when I'm browsing a page on my Mac, I can pick up where I left off on my phone. Anyway, the fact that a lot of the functionality of my phone is now available from my Mac really streamlines my workflow and just makes me a lot more productive at home, so I thought I'd mention that. It was a pleasure to read Alex "Meghcap" Hall's thoughtful article about the accessibility features of the Mac's VoiceOver screen reader as compared to those of the leading Windows screen readers.
As I embark on my journey of beginning to learn the Mac, one sentence in particular compels me to ask a question. The last sentence of the section on Safari reads: "This is not to say Safari is at all unusable or slower, it just takes a lot to use Safari's strengths and work around what it can't do as efficiently. For example, does Safari render more pages accessible than its Windows counterparts? What about performing multi-step processes, such as purchasing an airline ticket or a product from an online store? What I'm driving at, I guess, is soliciting users' opinions on whetehr Safari can more or less hold its own against Windows screen readers.
I hope that both Safari's strengths and weaknesses can be objectively discussed so that new users like me can benefit from the learning resulting from this discussion. Apple comunity can be sometimes a little bite I recall listenning several times folks talking against the virtual buffers for example, because they give the user a "false" experience, because they distort what thhe web is, because bla bla bla bla Apple implemented on Safari the very same thing and strangely enough all the criticism has sudenly fully and completely disappeared.
What irritates me in Safari is its slowness in some operations. Other stuff I think windows is still better is stuff related to onMouseOver. Press ctrl ins enter and the virtual buffer will update itself in a nice and easy way letting you know that itself has changed. In mac you have first to figure out the element has a mouseOver functionality, as far as I know it won't proactively let you know.
Soon after you have to move the mouse pointer over the element. But,, because the cursors are usually following onn each other, you will have to stop them from tracking because if you move the VO cursor to access the changes the mouse cursor will move and exit the element on what it was just placed, making the changes to disappear and once you stop tracking you then need to figure out what and where things changed.
In terms of productivity a ctrl ins enter and being able to quickly figure out what is going on still is better. In the other hand, safari groups elements in a webpage, something that is wounderful once you get the grasp of it and can make your navigation very fast and structured, something that windows screen readers can not make at the current moment.
Sometimes I am faster on iPhone because the structure of the screen is so much pleasant to navigate by exploring the screen, sometinmes Mac will render it better, sometimes windows plus all its easy of access implemented by multiple SR's will do better and this is why, differently from the majority people here, I will recomend that you have all these platforms in your hands and use whatever is more eficient to acumplish tasks.
The good solution is the one that best solves your current problem and knowing one solution doesn't prevent you from using others when it's needed Skip to main content. Search this site. Stability As long as I can remember, Windows screen readers have done really odd things. Braille Support Apple's implementation of braille support isn't perfect, but it is good.
Built-in Apps Windows comes with a basic wordprocessor Notepad , a web browser, a media player, and that's pretty much it. Safari Using Safari is very different from using Firefox or Internet Explorer, but it has its upsides. Less Powerful Scripting In Windows screen readers, applications that are not accessible can sometimes be made more so through scripts. Safari Yes, it's a pro and a con, in my view. Bottom Line The Mac has a great deal to offer. Twitter Facebook. This is another great article. I've only had my Mac since the end of December, but I definitely agree with you about stability.
Both Internet Explorer and Firefox crashed on me constantly, as did most of the Windows screen readers I used. I love the stability of my Mac, both in Safari and Google Chrome. Voiceover has yet to crash on me as well. Hi Medcaf. I hope I got that right, I didn't look at your name first.
I really enjoyed why you now use a Mac and will try to explain my reasoning, some of you have seenit. My computer died, nothing looked like i should buy it, so I went with the Mac. I know people who do what you have, use Windows then then use the Mac once they know they can get around on it. Please don't think i'm saying your way is wrong, it's certainly not. I don't know nearly everything i used to know iwth Windows, nor is the Mac the best thing since being born to come out.
I was afraid i'd rely to much on a windows setup to do what i used to. Now,you can barely get me to remember what control shift escape does. I did have boot camp set up on my first mac, now wish I had it again just to be int he widnows environment. Has anyone else out there done what I di and jumped right into a Mac? I had a phone and pad before so that did help. I agree that Safari is not as easy to use, but if you get proficient with the trackpad, you can navigate nearly as fast as you can on Windows.
I think the thing that frustrates me about Apple fans is that they lose their Windows proficiency, which I feel is ultimately detrimental to employability. Almost all companies out there use it, and forgetting how to use Windows is going to hurt you in the long-run. Check out this Window Eyes thing, though. I think that the Window Eyes initiative ith Microsoft is a game changer in the PC arena and might be a consideration for someone looking at switching, but is not likely a deal changer for most in that position. The info in this great article on MS accessibility support is definitely out of date, I would not say their support is the top of the support world, but it has improved by leaps and bounds.
Part of MS's side of the deal with GW Micro was a revamp of their accessibility support department and I already know of many who have had much better experiences of late in dealing with MS support on accessibility issues. But other issues mentioned still remain. Though their are now a lot of lower cost options to get MS Office, one still has to pay for it if it isn't bundled with a new PC, which will count towards the GW Micro initiative BTW, all it takes is a valid registered copy, and the free Window Eyes does not come with the full compliment of voices nor with more than basic support from GW Micro.
One will have to pay for the Eloquence and Nuance voices and for the full support package. I am in need of a new computer, and I go back and forth over which way to go when I've saved enough. I am using a borrowed computer and can continue to borrow it for pretty much as long as I need, so I am considering just getting a full sized keyboard for my iPad and using it for writing, which is the main activity I am not able to do because of need to share time on the borrowed computer, so I can save up for the best Mac or PC I can get.
One resource I wish I could find, as I still find myself not knowing more than basic gestures in VoiceOver is a tutorial for full use of VoiceOver, particularly one aimed at helping either Window Eyes users specifically or at least users of major PC screen readers in general transition. How is it that spotlight can find it in seconds, and the finder takes secs to open up a folder from any of my programs.
Time for troubleshooting…. HI Dan — Afraid not! In that case, your system is probably experiencing hardware problems. HI Dan — tis apple memory installed by apple at the time of purchase — there are no peripherals except my apple mouse and apple keyboard and i am on a CAT 5 network via a cable no external drives nothing — over to you :. How much free disk space does your system have? Have you performed all firmware updates for the system? If you are running a new, bare OS installation on a stock system with no third-party hardware or software and you still have issues, I am stumped.
HI Dan, Well its had me stumped as well, thats why I dont use mavericks, its not good, going back to ML everything is just great — so here i stay till they get it sorted — and to answer your questions i got 1TB HD with free. I do agree though, that Mountain lion was a smooth ride. Failure of the hidden dock to pop up correctly when moused over. Seriously, Apple? And the Displaylink USB graphics support is now completely chuffed-up-the-muffin.
Upgrading to Mavericks is not a good idea for anyone who wants to continue to locally sync there Mac with their iPhone etc. Mavericks has removed local sync — forcing users to upload their personal data: contacts and calendars to iCloud. Not all of us want to put our stuff in US based cloud services. LOL what a joke. Another dumb move by Apple. Perhaps you should actually look at the settings…. I had Apple forced users to use iCloud, and put our data at risk of hacking, identity theft, unauthorized access, etc. Not to mention Mavericks doesnt support older versions of MS Office.
So after having these 2 major issues, i downgraded back to The only way for them to run Mtn.
Lion or Mavericks is to buy a new Mac. Having said that nobody should be running Lion. I have one Mac running Mavericks and one running Mtn. I do notice that my Mavericks Mac often fails to load web pages in the background. I blame the energy efficiency stuff that gives almost no CPU time to background processes. David correctly points out that folks with older macs are limited to Lion.
This is the case with me. I have a iMac that still functions great, runs Lion, but cannot upgrade to Mavericks. David incorrectly advises folks to stay on Snow Leopard instead of going to Lion if you are using an old machine. What Lion offers me is iCloud access. Which I use religiously. When I take pictures with my iPhone, they go to iCloud, then are automatically added to my photo library on my iMac.
This is not possible with Snow Leopard. Lion is such a mess on both of them, that I everything grinds to a slow quagmire with any uptime more than 36hours, requiring constant reboots. I do wish I could run software that is newer, but Apple is making Lion the minimum target for compiling any project in their developer tools now, so just about anything on the App Store is useless for these older Macs.
I believe there are quite a few celebrities who regret that their iPhone pictures went straight to iCloud, and from there out for the public to see…..
- Guide to iOS 7, OS X Mavericks and new Apple devices.
- 11 Replies;
- create installation media for windows 8.1 mac.
- visma enskild firma 2012 mac.
- ram ddr3 1600mhz mac mini.
- microsoft internet explorer download free mac.
You may not need to. I had a 1,1 running Yep, me too: my Santa Rosa MacBook 3. You know what the best and truly amazing thing would be for OSX. Get it to work with older machines. Now, that would earn some real deserved admiration and entrench customer loyalty. Not possible technically? But I will be buying one for the kids soon. Let them pay for it if they want something new :- In the meantime, stick them with hand-me-downs.
Now windows does not let you down like that your able to install almost any program you may like on the oldest os. Agreed that Lion was a mess. Mavericks is a different kind of mess. I was referring to Mountain Lion, not Lion, when I spoke of the stuff that worked. Eventually, an upgrade will be inevitable. I agree that Hopefully After upgrading to Mavericks, I found that the existing installation of Parallels would not run. I simply reinstalled still having the DMG and it was fine.
Mountain Lion was a good stable release, as was Snow Leopard. I solved the Mail problem years ago, as I always had trouble getting it to work with the ISP I was using at that time. Compared to Lion, Mavericks is a dream. Mail is a running joke. I think it will fix most of the complaints anyone has about Mavericks. Lion was an epic mess that Apple should never have released, while Mavericks is a slight mess that badly needs the Mountain Lion is hard to find much to complain about.
Biggest example? Mail app. Mail has turned into an unreliable nightmare, basically unusable. None of the patches or fixes have resolved the problems. Apple is twiddling their thumbs while Mail users are outraged, just take a peak at their forums, or talk to anyone who, once upon a time, used Mail as their reliable email client. Also Mavericks has weird Finder slowness, weird stalling of apps probably the App Nap feature , and occasional network issues.
None of this makes any sense and has any obvious cause or resolution. My 2 cents? Developer friends tell me that My experiences exactly and great recommendations. This site is a testament that one can never please everyone all the time. The Mac absolutely rocks! Finally, a breath of honesty at this lame-o site! Thank you Smarter Than The Rest! Skype me at sarah sarahlove.
My Late iMac running In fact, it has no apparent system issues at all. I have to support Honest Abe and Forsberg. If you depend on the mail app to manage multiple addresses and store important streams of conversation do not upgrade to Maverick. I see no other advantage over Mountain Lion that is worth the aggravation of delayed and lost mail plus inexplicable behavior in archive and draft folders. I got to know a supervisor at Apple support very well over the first 2 weeks after the upgrade and that is not what I want from a new operating system.
Goodbye, again, to this mess. Will try again in a year. Since I last tried it. Oh, so you put tab like windows in finder. I already had that thanks to 3rd party software. I stopped using the iPhone because it stopped evolving since the iPhone 4. I now use Android devices because of the freedom of compatibility. This is not my 2 cents.. This is my thousands of dollars I save by not buying Retina Macbooks with soldered on memory and harddrives. Also have a Macbook from with a new ssd and I see no reason in upgrading to these new un-upgradeable mac devices.
Hey Reinaldo,i think your of great help and i support you.. Many apps in OSX are now slow or just hang , there are continuing problems with wifi , and even keyboard and mouse. Added to the fact that Apple parts made in China , keyboard , mouse , pad etc do not last. I am two months deep into hellish troubleshooting even after speaking with over a dozen Apple specialists, none of them thought of one simple way I could downgrade back to Mountian Lion option, boot from an older time machine backup from before i accidentally upgraded to mavericks- yet not as easy as it sounds.
You will be singing the praises of OS X Mavericks in no time. Name required. Mail will not be published required. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction without explicit permission is prohibited. July 12, at pm. Frustr says:. March 22, at pm. Jim says:. December 30, at am. Sebby says:. July 17, at am. Jamb says:. October 9, at am. Adisha says:. October 10, at am. August 28, at pm. Brian says:. August 17, at am. Thomas Matlack says:. May 21, at am. Andy V says:. May 26, at am. Andrew says:. May 9, at pm. Boyan says:. March 31, at am.
BuyMeAMacPro says:. January 7, at am. Omfg it's Mick bumhold says:. August 23, at pm. July 31, at am. Heavy says:. November 3, at am. March 16, at am. JOHN says:. March 3, at pm. PG says:. February 3, at pm. OS X Snow Leopard says:. December 27, at am. December 20, at pm. December 18, at am. Jack Bohica says:. December 6, at pm. December 5, at pm. December 6, at am. Wyatt says:. November 22, at pm. Marlon says:.
March 5, at pm. February 10, at pm. Adrian says:. November 12, at am. Jacob says:. November 11, at am. Mark Denver says:. October 20, at am. Matt says:. August 15, at pm. Zoltan says:. August 9, at am. Joan Sands says:. August 4, at am. Comprehension says:. Mario says:. August 2, at am. Steve Lee says:. July 23, at pm. Howard Ellison says:. July 20, at am. J Lee Harshbarger says:. July 8, at pm. Igor says:. June 24, at am. Don says:. June 23, at am. Joel says:. June 1, at am. Karen says:. May 14, at am.
May 12, at pm. Brandon Sky says:. March 27, at pm. David D. March 23, at pm. Greg Frost says:. February 26, at pm. Russell Aaron says:. February 24, at am. Chris says:. February 23, at pm. Peggy Sue says:. February 22, at pm. Pete says:. February 20, at pm. TomH says:. February 19, at pm. DG says:.
February 20, at am. Michael Logue says:. RuralRob says:. Ignite Mindz says:. David M says:. February 19, at am. David says:. Max says:. Ichabod says:. AaronP says:. Presets says:. Dan Andersen says:. Ken says:. Paul says:. Wily says:. HannaRhiannon says:. Luca says:. Lee says:.
Eithanius says:. Theo Vosse says:. Derek Jones says:. Robert says:. February 18, at pm. Mazzda says:. Sliders Alright says:. Sioryn says:. DCJ says:. Don Bruno says:. Geoff says:. Doug says:. Michael says:. Lou says:. Bob Forsberg says:. Isidore says:. Wilfred says:. McD says:. Graxxor says:. Mark says:. That isn't true says:. April 10, at am. Mike says:. April 30, at am. Steve says:. Ed says:. Tom says:. SixnaHalfFeet says:. October 27, at pm. Johnny says:. October 15, at am. Hammer says:.
Allison says:. May 22, at pm. June 16, at am. MickM says:. Bernard says:.
Is Your Mac Still Running OS X Lion? Why? You Should Upgrade to OS X Mavericks
Michael Staley says:. Bob Pale says:. Honest Abe says:. Smarter Than The Rest says:. Sarah says:. Roger Colonnese says:. Doctor X says:. Reinaldo says:. June 13, at am. Laishram Robin says:. Yung Don says:.